- Not having enough physical technique developed on your
instrument to do the types of things that will allow you to be
creative. If you are severely restricted musically by what your
hands are able to do (or rather, what your hands are not able to
do), it will be physically hard (or impossible) to do certain
creative things.
- Not knowing how or when to control your technique.
- Thinking too much about what your hands can do instead
of what you want them to be able to do in order to execute
your creative possibilities.
If you have any of the above problems, work on fixing them because
those things, although not really elements of creativity itself, are
the basic skills that one must posses to be creative/expressive on
an instrument. The human mind is amazing and can do several
simultaneous operations, but the more things you ask your mind to do
at the same time, the more difficult it becomes to do any of them
well. To really be creative and musically expressive, you need as
much of your conscious brain energy as possible to be concentrating
on being creative/expressive. If you don't really understand what
notes you can use in a given situation to produce desirable results,
and at the same time your mind has no idea what the notes are going
to sound like before you play them, and at the same time, you are
struggling with the limitations of what you can physically play, and
at the same time, you don't know how to control dissonance, etc.,
how much conscious brain power do you actually have left to think
about improvising an expressive guitar solo, create an original
melody, or to write a song with new ideas? I would bet that the
majority of those of you reading this have this problem to some
extent. I suggest to make it a priority to get these basic skills
under your belt as soon as you can.
Once you have (or if you have) a good amount of control over the
basic musicianship skills, you are ready to go deeper into the
creative aspects of playing / writing.
I usually find that my most creative musical ideas don't come
from thinking about music at all. I look at other forms of art (and
nature) to find new ways to see creativity. Once I have an
interesting idea or concept in mind, I look to find all the possible
ways that I may be able to adapt that into musical form to suit my
musical needs. Following is an example of what I am talking about.
A few years ago I began thinking about the similarities and
differences in the different processes that are used in separate art
forms (painting, music, poetry, stone or marble sculpture, etc.) Of
the four I just mentioned, only stone cut and marble cut sculpture
starts with something (the raw materials of stone or marble)
and then the artist destructively eliminates materials to
create the art. Poetry, music and painting generally are created
from nothing (no materials from which to take away from) thus
the artist creates the music constructively (adding materials
- letters, words, musical pitches, rhythms, brush strokes of wet
paint, etc.). I once made this simple analysis of the stone
sculpture process, I knew that its importance would be significant
and valuable to me eventually. After almost a year of thinking about
a way in which I could apply the principle of destructive creation
(versus constructive creation), I finally had some brand new ideas
(at least they were brand new ideas to me) for a new creative way
(process) to write music. I found ways to apply this to general
musical compositional processes and form. I'm sure there are more
ways to apply the principal that I have not yet thought of. If I
told you my own discoveries it might hinder you from discovering
your own and going beyond what I was able to do. I encourage you to
think deeply about how you might be able to apply destructive
creation into new musical writing processes.
Another example of taking creative processes from other forms
came when I was watching a Disney movie on DVD. There was a special
features section after the movie on the DVD in which the film makers
showed diagrams and charts called story boards. The purpose of these
story boards was to communicate more clearly the ideas from the
writers and producers of the movie to the artists who were creating
the animation for the film. I thought about how this might be
applied to my advantage when writing the music for my "Opus 2" CD.
Since I had in my mind all of the things I wanted to express in the
music, I used this story board technique to better communicate
between the right side of my brain and the left side of my brain. I
charted out with diagrams, charts, elemental lists, etc. all of my
non musical ideas (emotions, thoughts, ideals, experiences, etc.)
that I wanted expressed in the music. The plans were much more
organized now, I could clearly see what I wanted to be expressed at
what moment during the music. This helped to keep me on track
musically. I was very pleased with the final result. There many
other processes that I used in composing "Opus 2" (and "Opus 1"),
but this general principal is one that I think any composer or
songwriter can use no matter how advanced or basic one's music
writing skills are.
As the previous example illustrates, I typically think about what
I want to express before I think about writing the music. That is
something that surprisingly not a lot (probably most) songwriters
don't really do much (especially in the non classical music world.)
I'm not saying that my ways and processes for writing music are
better than someone else's way (because I believe all methods are
legitimate), I'm just offering here one of my ways of composing
which may be a new approach for you.